Remove Curriculum Development Remove Definition Remove Staff Development
article thumbnail

Reflection and metacognition for veterinary students

Teaching Matters Student Employment

The aim of the course is to provide general support and advice on personal and professional development, including the opportunity for students to consider their own weaknesses and strengths. All students who are repeating a year or part-year are required to take this course and must pass in order to progress. What next for reflection?

article thumbnail

An introduction to student and staff co-creation of the curriculum

Teaching Matters Experiential Learning

This definition helps show the many different ways that students can work in partnership with staff to improve learning and teaching, but Cook-Sather, Bovill and Felten also emphasise that all partnerships must be built on strong working relationships that foster respect, reciprocity, and shared responsibility.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Welcome to the October issue of Teaching Matters: Research-led teaching and learning

Teaching Matters Student Engagement

” So, at an instrumentally beneficial level, “research-led teaching reflects and makes use of the teacher’s disciplinary research to benefit student learning and outcomes” (Trowler & Wareham, 2008).

article thumbnail

Mini-series: What is the value of lecture recording at the University of Edinburgh?

Teaching Matters Online Learning

Lecturers talked about recordings ‘canonising’ the material in the lectures, making them the definitive version of the material in the eyes of the students. Recording could make lecturers more self-conscious about their appearance, or stop them from making certain jokes, changing how they wanted to present the material.

article thumbnail

Characterising teaching practices using lecture recordings

Teaching Matters Online Learning

The definitions for each activity were then updated accordingly and the process repeated until percentage agreement between coders reached an acceptable level. Results At the time of writing, a total of 183 lectures have been coded using the final version of FILL+, with an average percentage agreement of 95.6% between coders.