This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Under the guidance and visionary leadership of our current President and CEO, Dr. Michael Lomax , ICB officially launched in 2006. We realized that we had the technology, capability, and infrastructure, but our institutions needed more curriculumdevelopment and engagement. But then we had a snag. Were shaping it.
A screenshot of Chenée Psaros’ lifestream blog When it comes to assessment, students are challenged to think critically about the changing nature of authorship and scholarship within digital environments (see for instance Bayne 2006; Lea 2013). Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for HigherEducation. Hounsell et al.
Other lecturers are using electronic voting systems (Bates, Howie & Murphy, 2006), social media (Ross, 2016) and ‘technology enhanced active learning spaces’ (Roger, Ney & Liote, 2016) to enhance the level of engagement in the subject and to promote paired and small group working in large classes. References Bates, S.P., Howie, K. &
Zuzanna demonstrates how to use a UV-vis spectrophotometer Peer feedback means that students get a chance to review their work, there is a possibility to review work in situ, making changes based on suggestions before submitting the final video for assessment (see Hendry (2013) and Sander and Good (2006). and Taras M. (ed.), and Good E.,
Critical Pedagogy as Collective Social Expertise in HigherEducation, International Journal of Progressive Education, 2(3): 47-65. In the Professionalism 4 course, approximately four students are allocated to each study circle. The Stationary Office: London. McLean, (2014). The Vale of Leven Hospital Inquiry Report.
Gibbs (2006) discusses the importance of feedback in the learning process and I felt this was particularly relevant here as there is no one right way to approach career planning and the concept of “career” is so subjective. 2006): How assessment frames student learning in C. References: Brophy, J. Bryan and K.
As Scotland marks 20 years of its enhancement-led approach to quality in the highereducation sector, I reflect on my involvement, particularly around work supporting student development, employability, and personal and professional success.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content